🔗 Share this article Relatives' Distress Regarding Shoreline Degradation Endangering Norfolk Graves Loved ones of people buried in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision over how to tackle the problem is creating unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their departed family. An Impending Danger to Historic Churchyards The council have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the ocean in the coming decades. A newly published study on the issue sets out a range of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure locations. Officials maintain it is for the community to decide how to move forward. “Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They intended this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.” Estimates suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated. Troubled by the Past One resident recalled a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground. “It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for treasures. That is completely undignified.” “I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.” A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril Along the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while working overseas. His mother said she could not sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be relocated. “It truly disturb me to consider this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.” She believes, new burials should cease but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been reached.” Searching for Answers and Certainty An absence of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the problem has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried. Some are calling for more coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to continue for now. Different voices argue the time for relocation is drawing near. “It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.” A local official said the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with residents.” It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the options. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.” “Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. We need productive local conversations to find the appropriate answers for each village.” The possibility of losing the historic sites was described as one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in life after death, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.